Fear Street: Part Two - 1978

Come on guys, this movie wants to show us another definition of horror movie. Please don't compare this movie with another horror movie. Just watch ! The casts is so great.

Just like the opening part of this dumb film trilogy, Fear Street Part Two: 1978 is a flat, predictable and disappointing teen slasher. It's just a slasher-thriller with a completely flat story and a painfully tedious momentum. The critics are out of their minds whilst rating this highly and classing it as a true horror mystery with epic tension. Firstly, Fear Street: 1978 isn't at all scary or ominous like it believes it is. Based on R. L. Stine's Fear Street novels, without being anything like the Fear Street novels, this second chapter of a gory trilogy isn't scary and contains too much unnecessary adult content. It's another one of those typical horror movies that relies on violence and scary outfits to terrify. Obviously it fails. And to actual real horror fans who have witnessed many slashers, Fear Street 2 is predictable and mostly boring. It also could've been a better part to Fear Street if the characters weren't so dumb and unlikeable. Every single character is literally just a dramatic, irritating teen who just wants to be the hero and save the day. What many people will enjoy about this film is the decent storyline and bloody killings, which aren't as compelling as the first film's brutal, gory slayings. It's just a big let down and a complete disappointment. If you are one of those people who are terrified of tedious gore and like simple slashing and mystery, you just aren't a real horror fan. Fear Street Part Two: 1978 is one of those kinds of horror films. If you liked this review, check out the full review and other reviews at aussieboyreviews.

The 70s camp theme didn't quite deliver as much as I was hoping, however it's a lot of fun to watch the story come together. Much like its predecessor, this movie struggles to feel like the decade it's based in. Which is a real shame because I could see these becoming cult classics if they pulled off the retro look. I preferred 1994, but Sadie Sink was a joy to watch on screen, she really carried the movie. I'll definitely be watching 1666, but I'd be lying if I said I wasn't nervous, olden days horror movies scare the crap out of me!

I have to say that the second movie it's much better than first fear street movie. It was more interesting and scary. But there are still things that need to be improved. Really recommend.

This was so, so much better than Part One. There's one exposition scene that doesn't fit, but it's over almost as soon as it starts. The film is consistent throughout, isn't afraid to be brutal, and finally delivers on the tone the trailers promised for this trilogy.

This movie was SO much better than the first. The first felt very confused about what story it was trying to tell, the weird "nostalgia", and awful characters. This movie had much better acting and characters that you could root for . I did like the characters and thought they were written much better, and I really did feel sad at some characters deaths (which is more than I can say for the first movie). However, one issue I had with this movie was how confusing it was to be told in reverse. I felt a bit underwhelmed at some of the scenes because I knew what was going to happen. I also am dissatisfied that the first movies plot is being dragged in with this one. Although, I am too deep into watching these movies and am excited to see 1666.