Mythica 5: The Godslayer

Good day everyone! ‎📲 You can earn daily 5k income by monetizing using just your smartphone & Whats App no pay ments required and no hidden charges. ‎👉 Go to tele gram and search for @dominusupdates you'll see the link, guide & more free updates! ‎Join now, let your phone and Whats App work for you.

Following the less serious "Iron Crown" (ep 4), this final episode was back to its charming seriousness again. Aware of it being the conclusion, it had more of the steady, epic feel of a final journey, different from the others, more reflective on life as a process. It was nice to feel this difference, like that of an evening walk. It contained the essentials of what Mythica is all about - magic, dilemmas, sacrifice, successes and failures, plus 'the ending'. If you've come this far, you will undoubtedly be watching this final episode whatever the ratings, but it's a good one to close the series. If you've not watched them yet, do certainly watch all five in their order if you generally enjoy the genre.

I enjoy the Mythica movies. They're not great but they're fine and there aren't a lot of options for those of us that like fantasy stories. If you thought the first one was watchable, then I'd say watch the whole series since they're all roughly the same quality IMO.

This is not Lord of the Rings. It is not even big budget. What it is, is brilliant achievement given the budget. All the movies are watchable and entertaining, I watched them all on Amazon as soon as they came out.

For me, there are some good points in this movie but almost of them are bad. The good things here are the level of effects I give 6 out of 10, and artists also have good skills as you saw, as well as make-up professionals, clothing designers, photography, and a camera man ... etc. We have nice things here. I will not make reading long on the readers, I will jump to the bad points direct: unclear end. different scenario in each movie different empire and tools in between scents, many tons of silly scents unexpected reasons and not logical, just pass it. you will decide as I do to grant it one star, and that single star goes to the poor actors crew. has a purely atheistic in all of it's parts. stupid love story included has a conflict in the story built. the movie need a new different director, 2nd director and director assist, and new writer too in the first place, I mean is this a story to be filmed? too silly. So.. Dear reader, I present to you the advice of your life, please if you very excited about this movie, then please please see only the first part, the first one only, I said only, because if you watch the next releases, you gonna watch the longest throughout history of your life, yes the first version has a wonderful imagination and vfx effects and a complex idea and maybe you will fall in love with the actors., But the end is not clear and the goal turned out Later it is to produce a set of releases for purely material goals where there is no idea that really deserves to be paid for the production of such a gruesome movie ,, my advice is for you .. the following parts are just a waste of time, why? Here is why: Every new issue has a different identity with the version of the one that kissed, I mean the writer and director, are you serious? Or only to pump booster funds? What a story like rubbish, well the scriptwriter may have had some creations but the overall story and story line of the movie is purely atheistic, not this only, but all the five parts can be in 20 minutes. stretching the movie to be like a true movie isn't good Idea, I do search of what the director's movie list, just to exclude them from watching later,. If you believe in some beliefs from any heavenly Bible, you will discover that the content of the movie fights your beliefs and even attempts to sow some ideas that may cause your heart to move away from your true God. Repeating some scenes indicates a shortage of the story and covering that by lengthening some scenes to obtain a longer time for the duration of the film. All this indicates poor content and the emptiness of the idea. Many scenes are illogical, suddenly what the director wants happens, as if in the mind of a young child if he could not get something he have to imagine it and jump through by force without scrutiny, you just pass it, watch and shut up. I wonder who is the financial supporter, how did he become convinced of the idea and support them with money? Either ignorant, child or fool, the sane know how to spend their money and where. I see some arabs names here in the movie look like a raven who loved a pigeon and tried to imitate her gait so he forgot his real gait and lost the pigeon gait .. I meant Mr of the inventor Saad Al-Anzi - Yabu tara fasshhaltna marra!